Help! Amazon Warriors Are Invading My Novel!

Because of years of gender inequality, every fiction writer in existence feels the calling… The calling to write “strong” female characters. (Feel free to squirm under the weight of my sweeping generalization.)

“Well, first of all, WELCOME TO ONE OF MY PET PEEVES,” says Lori in her post on Tumblr.

Preach it, sister.

Excuse me while I get up on my soap box…

getting_on_my_soapbox_by_aniketosen-d5and0i

Alright. Here’s what inspired the post that inspired this post. Lori was asked this question:

tumblr_mnm6hvv4hU1qjkimlo1_500

Part of Lori’s response is frequently quoted. Some have made it into a meme. Here’s the Disney Princess edition:

0997fabdb03b239102ef3fda3d07fbb5

Lori talks about female characters with weak characteristics being written off as “damsels in distress.” As feminists (you are one, surely), we have to promote “strong” females in literature, because women need to be empowered, dang it!

First of all, no. That’s a terrible way to go. Think of all the women left out, who would think themselves not good enough because they can’t match the Xena strong-woman ideal.

Second of all, the flaw I find in extreme feminist thinking is easily found in Lori’s answer. At one point, she says: if a female character is only ever weak, if she’s flat, if she “has no agency of her own, [and] only exists to define other characters (usually men),” then she isn’t a person. The goal in writing female characters is to create people.

When we limit women saying they can only be Distressed Damsels or Amazon Warriors, we’re creating a type, a stereotype. George R. R. Martin, when asked about his interesting female characters responds this way:

nu2Mipb

I read another author’s take on women (both the quote and the author’s name has vanished from my memory). He said we don’t need more “strong” women, but more women. More women in stories to be all the qualities Lori talks about in her internet famous quote.

But, I think we have to take this a step further and think, if we stop at developing female characters as real people, we could ignore how the gender coin has two sides. We need both genders to make equality. We need dynamic male characters alongside dynamic female characters and vice versa. We need men not boxed in by cultural expectations and men who conform to them. We need male characters to be as interesting as the female.

Because stories are about people. And people are diverse. And that’s kind of awesome.

2 Comments (+add yours?)

  1. Jordan N.
    Mar 14, 2015 @ 12:54:52

    I love this post! You do a great job of capturing the “feminist” problem. I wouldn’t call myself a feminist for so long because it has such a strong association with man-hating, but that’s not what it means to believe in gender equality. Thanks for sharing this.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

  2. madameknight
    Mar 14, 2015 @ 16:04:30

    I agree that female characters need to be complex. But not all writers who want to write “strong” female characters mean “strong” in the sense that they are warriors or fighters. For me, writing a “strong” character doesn’t come from their physicality or abilities, but in the way that they develop emotionally. It’s about how they learn to not cower, or begin to understand when they need to shut up. I’m not focusing on power fantasies- I’m looking to say something to my reader about who they could be if they want.

    Like

    Reply

Leave a comment